|
Thimerosal contiains ETHLYMERCURY & THIOSALICYLATE Just As Dr Haley States!
2005-06-25 06:28:45
Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Sep;29(3):152-4. Related Articles, Links Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thimerosal hypersensitivity. Pirker C, Moslinger T, Wantke F, Gotz M, Jarisch R. Dermatologic and Pediatric Allergy Clinic, Vienna, Austria. The causative agent of thimerosal allergy (sodium ethylmercury thiosalicylate) has not previously been thoroughly investigated. To evaluate whether the organic mercury component or the thiosalicylic acid molecule induces thimerosal sensitization, 23 patients positive to thimerosal were patch tested with ethylmercuric chloride, thiosalicylic acid and 8 different derivatives of mercury. To date, ethylmercuric chloride has not been tested in thimerosal allergy. 19/23 patients (82%) showed positive patch test reactions to ethylmercuric chloride. 4/23 patients negative to ethylmercuric chloride reacted positively to thimerosal 0.1% but not to thimerosal 0.05%. 8/23 patients (35%) also reacted to other mercurials. 20 controls negative to thimerosal showed negative patch test reactions to ethylmercuric chloride. Neither patients nor controls reacted to thiosalicylic acid. These results indicate that testing with thimerosal 0.1% leads to false-positive reactions and that the ethyl mercury component is the responsible agent in thimerosal allergy. PMID: 8222628 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2005-06-25 00:27:31
LadyLollipop wrote: > Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Sep;29(3):152-4. Related Articles, Links > > > Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thimerosal > hypersensitivity. > > Pirker C, Moslinger T, Wantke F, Gotz M, Jarisch R. > > Dermatologic and Pediatric Allergy Clinic, Vienna, Austria. > > The causative agent of thimerosal allergy (sodium ethylmercury > thiosalicylate) has not previously been thoroughly investigated. To evaluate > whether the organic mercury component or the thiosalicylic acid molecule > induces thimerosal sensitization, 23 patients positive to thimerosal were > patch tested with ethylmercuric chloride, thiosalicylic acid and 8 different > derivatives of mercury. To date, ethylmercuric chloride has not been tested > in thimerosal allergy. 19/23 patients (82%) showed positive patch test > reactions to ethylmercuric chloride. 4/23 patients negative to ethylmercuric > chloride reacted positively to thimerosal 0.1% but not to thimerosal 0.05%. > 8/23 patients (35%) also reacted to other mercurials. 20 controls negative > to thimerosal showed negative patch test reactions to ethylmercuric > chloride. Neither patients nor controls reacted to thiosalicylic acid. These > results indicate that testing with thimerosal 0.1% leads to false-positive > reactions and that the ethyl mercury component is the responsible agent in > thimerosal allergy. > > PMID: 8222628 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Er, Jan. The fool Boyd Haley's error was in stating separately that thimerosal is 49.6% by weight mercury and also 49.6% by weight ethyl mercury; his deception was in giving the impression that this composition by weight was of toxological significance. Cathy
2005-06-25 10:21:48
LadyLollipop wrote:
> Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Sep;29(3):152-4. Related Articles, Links > > > Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thimerosal > hypersensitivity. Ethyl mercury is not stored in an infant and rapidly clears through the feces in a few days. Thus, there is NO accumulation as alleged by the anti-vac liars, like Jan Drew, and, this is nothing more than scaremongering and one-sided propaganda.
2005-06-26 02:00:53
LadyLollipop wrote: > "cathyb" > news:1119709733.173262.39100@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > Mark Probert wrote: > >> LadyLollipop wrote: > >> > Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Sep;29(3):152-4. Related Articles, Links > >> > > >> > > >> > Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thimerosal > >> > hypersensitivity. > >> > >> Ethyl mercury is not stored in an infant and rapidly clears through the > >> feces in a few days. Thus, there is NO accumulation as alleged by the > >> anti-vac liars, like Jan Drew, and, this is nothing more than > >> scaremongering and one-sided propaganda. > > Mark Probert is a LIAR. Proven many times over. > > > > > And, again , as one of the scientists Jan has quoted found, a lot later > > than 1993: > > > > J Appl Toxicol. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):263-9 > > > > > > Neurotoxic character of thimerosal and the allometric extrapolation of > > adult clearance half-time to infants. > > > > > > Magos L. > > > > > > laszloma...@aol.com > > > > > > Abstract > > > > > > The decomposition rate of organomercurials and the potency of the > > blood-brain barrier increase with the size of the organic radical. Thus > > > > methylmercury damages the brain more than thimerosal does, and when > > intake limits set for methylmercury are applied to thimerosal the > > safety margin is increased even if the clearances were the same. > > However, the clearance half-time of ethylmercury in adults is about > > one-third of the 50 days' clearance half-time of methylmercury given > > for 60 kg body weight. Moreover, because metabolic rates (e.g. basal > > metabolism, daily loss of mercury in per cent of body burden) in > > different weight groups are related to the fractional power of body > > weight (rule of allometry), mercury clears from the infant body faster > > than from the adult body. Blood mercury concentrations observed after > > vaccination showed agreement with allometrically extrapolated > > concentrations. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. > > > > Cathy > > Which doesn't change a thing. > > Peter Bowditch is a LIAR. > > CathyB is a proven Liar, I just proved it. She had to lie again to cover up > her first lie. You still haven't indicated what I said that you thought to be a lie, so you certainly haven't proved that I lied. As it happens, I have told one lie since I started posting, in a post to one of the Riches when I said that christians I knew smirked when the subject of Mary's virginity came up. It was a facetious, throwaway remark, which I withdrew and apologised for. You, on the other hand, have been shown to be economical with the truth on many occasions. Your lies about Indiana's daycare centre rules about administering medication to children and subsequent ones about the availability of those rules on the net. Your lies about your not being an anti-semitic homophobe, easily exposed by a desultory search of this group alone. Your constant snipping of what others say to change their meaning. Your accusing others of lying simply because they disagree with you. Your switching threads to post the same rubbish which you know to be untrue because others have proved it. Your incessant accusations concerning Mark Probert, for which you refuse to provide evidence. Your mendacity is legendary. I will not provide evidence of any of this (coincidentally, your own practice), because you will simply and baselessly repeat "liar' here or in another thread. You are an embarrassment to your co-'alties', which is why they may support you when you speak on alternative medicine, but not when you play 'liar, liar', or openly lie yourself. You are an embarrassment to your professed religion in your mendacity, your racism, your anti-semitism, your homophobia and your evident stupidity; I've yet to come across a more inept liar. Moreover, you are even an embarrassment to atheists like me who believe that just to be human requires a level of integrity and humaneness that you evidently lack. You are an embarrassment to yourself. Cathy
2005-06-26 02:49:31
cathyb wrote: > LadyLollipop wrote: > > Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Sep;29(3):152-4. Related Articles, Links > > > > > > Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thimerosal > > hypersensitivity. > > > > Pirker C, Moslinger T, Wantke F, Gotz M, Jarisch R. > > > > Dermatologic and Pediatric Allergy Clinic, Vienna, Austria. > > > > The causative agent of thimerosal allergy (sodium ethylmercury > > thiosalicylate) has not previously been thoroughly investigated. To evaluate > > whether the organic mercury component or the thiosalicylic acid molecule > > induces thimerosal sensitization, 23 patients positive to thimerosal were > > patch tested with ethylmercuric chloride, thiosalicylic acid and 8 different > > derivatives of mercury. To date, ethylmercuric chloride has not been tested > > in thimerosal allergy. 19/23 patients (82%) showed positive patch test > > reactions to ethylmercuric chloride. 4/23 patients negative to ethylmercuric > > chloride reacted positively to thimerosal 0.1% but not to thimerosal 0.05%. > > 8/23 patients (35%) also reacted to other mercurials. 20 controls negative > > to thimerosal showed negative patch test reactions to ethylmercuric > > chloride. Neither patients nor controls reacted to thiosalicylic acid. These > > results indicate that testing with thimerosal 0.1% leads to false-positive > > reactions and that the ethyl mercury component is the responsible agent in > > thimerosal allergy. > > > > PMID: 8222628 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] > > Er, Jan. The fool Boyd Haley's error was in stating separately that > thimerosal is 49.6% by weight mercury and also 49.6% by weight ethyl > mercury; his deception was in giving the impression that this > composition by weight was of toxological significance. > > Cathy
2005-06-26 02:50:33
cathyb wrote: > LadyLollipop wrote: > > Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Sep;29(3):152-4. Related Articles, Links > > > > > > Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thimerosal > > hypersensitivity. > > > > Pirker C, Moslinger T, Wantke F, Gotz M, Jarisch R. > > > > Dermatologic and Pediatric Allergy Clinic, Vienna, Austria. > > > > The causative agent of thimerosal allergy (sodium ethylmercury > > thiosalicylate) has not previously been thoroughly investigated. To evaluate > > whether the organic mercury component or the thiosalicylic acid molecule > > induces thimerosal sensitization, 23 patients positive to thimerosal were > > patch tested with ethylmercuric chloride, thiosalicylic acid and 8 different > > derivatives of mercury. To date, ethylmercuric chloride has not been tested > > in thimerosal allergy. 19/23 patients (82%) showed positive patch test > > reactions to ethylmercuric chloride. 4/23 patients negative to ethylmercuric > > chloride reacted positively to thimerosal 0.1% but not to thimerosal 0.05%. > > 8/23 patients (35%) also reacted to other mercurials. 20 controls negative > > to thimerosal showed negative patch test reactions to ethylmercuric > > chloride. Neither patients nor controls reacted to thiosalicylic acid. These > > results indicate that testing with thimerosal 0.1% leads to false-positive > > reactions and that the ethyl mercury component is the responsible agent in > > thimerosal allergy. > > > > PMID: 8222628 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] > > Er, Jan. The fool Boyd Haley's error was in stating separately that > thimerosal is 49.6% by weight mercury and also 49.6% by weight ethyl > mercury; his deception was in giving the impression that this > composition by weight was of toxological significance. > > Cathy Eew. Of course I meant toxicological. Cathy
2005-06-26 22:14:50
"cathyb" news:1119779371.229289.147340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > > > cathyb wrote: >> LadyLollipop wrote: >> > Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Sep;29(3):152-4. Related Articles, Links >> > >> > >> > Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thimerosal >> > hypersensitivity. >> > >> > Pirker C, Moslinger T, Wantke F, Gotz M, Jarisch R. >> > >> > Dermatologic and Pediatric Allergy Clinic, Vienna, Austria. >> > >> > The causative agent of thimerosal allergy (sodium ethylmercury >> > thiosalicylate) has not previously been thoroughly investigated. To >> > evaluate >> > whether the organic mercury component or the thiosalicylic acid >> > molecule >> > induces thimerosal sensitization, 23 patients positive to thimerosal >> > were >> > patch tested with ethylmercuric chloride, thiosalicylic acid and 8 >> > different >> > derivatives of mercury. To date, ethylmercuric chloride has not been >> > tested >> > in thimerosal allergy. 19/23 patients (82%) showed positive patch test >> > reactions to ethylmercuric chloride. 4/23 patients negative to >> > ethylmercuric >> > chloride reacted positively to thimerosal 0.1% but not to thimerosal >> > 0.05%. >> > 8/23 patients (35%) also reacted to other mercurials. 20 controls >> > negative >> > to thimerosal showed negative patch test reactions to ethylmercuric >> > chloride. Neither patients nor controls reacted to thiosalicylic acid. >> > These >> > results indicate that testing with thimerosal 0.1% leads to >> > false-positive >> > reactions and that the ethyl mercury component is the responsible agent >> > in >> > thimerosal allergy. >> > >> > PMID: 8222628 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] >> >> Er, Jan. The fool Boyd Haley's error was in stating separately that >> thimerosal is 49.6% by weight mercury and also 49.6% by weight ethyl >> mercury; his deception was in giving the impression that this >> composition by weight was of toxological significance. >> >> Cathy He's not in error, he's not a fool, he is absolutely correct.
|
|
