|
Re: Bad Cop, No Donut! The brave, resourceful CHP
2003-06-26 18:03:17
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:20:50 GMT, "Hempman"
> >"Bad wheels" >news:3efb2342.98231812@news-server.socal.rr.com... >> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:49:00 GMT, "Hempman" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Pfffffft.... Separare matter? The fact they were found not liable is >> >> the ONLY thing that matters. >> >> > >> >> I guess what you dont understand is that the plantiffs attorney & the >> >> officers attorney both presented cases. The jury found in favor of the >> >> officers. Thats as legal as it gets. >> > >> >Legality does not equal morality. Cops are immoral, unethical losers. >Rant >> >on, but you are still losers. >> > >> > >> There is where you are wrong. Most cops serve in a ethical manner. No >> one can deny there are bad cops out there & I'm as critical of them as >> anyone. > >An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does >truth become error because nobody will see it. Just because a jury was >fooled doesn't mean thier decision was correct. > >I wonder if you understand the lack of ethics in the "War on Drugs"? I >wonder if you understand that a cop accepting free food at Denney's, or >letting one's cop friends off tickets they deserve is unethical? Most cops >do these things. Therefore most cops are unethical. > >> >> BTW, stoner, I'm not a cop. > >Who gives a fuck. You're a cop apologist. Same delusions. > >
2003-06-26 18:32:39
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 20:06:20 +0200, Eric Johnson
wrote: > >>> And I know Mills Lane, personally. >>> >>> EJ >>> >> Great. He can ref. You going to get on with this or wimp out? > >Wimping out in this case would be to actually fight. Or are you -not- >following the discussion. Oh Im following it all right. It was you who brought up the idea of playing gladiator with Cucy. Now you are doing the back peddle like a mo fo.... >What will you call this little bout. Cucy dispatches Patches. > >Maybe I should do it. It would be good allegory. > >Problem is, if he beats me up, he will be exposed to charges as well. Oh, youre the kind of guy cho challenged another then presses charges when he gets his ass handed too him? Naw, you two agree ahead of time & its no problem. Stop making excuses & get on with it! >And -he- doesn't break the law. People box all the time without breaking the law. Sporting contests are not assaults.
2003-06-27 08:44:52
On 6/26/03 8:03 PM, in article 3efb35aa.4047593@news-server.socal.rr.com,
"Bad wheels" > On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:20:50 GMT, "Hempman" > > >> >> "Bad wheels" >> news:3efb2342.98231812@news-server.socal.rr.com... >>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:49:00 GMT, "Hempman" >>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> Pfffffft.... Separare matter? The fact they were found not liable is >>>>> the ONLY thing that matters. >>>>>> >>>>> I guess what you dont understand is that the plantiffs attorney & the >>>>> officers attorney both presented cases. The jury found in favor of the >>>>> officers. Thats as legal as it gets. >>>> >>>> Legality does not equal morality. Cops are immoral, unethical losers. >> Rant >>>> on, but you are still losers. >>>> >>>> >>> There is where you are wrong. Most cops serve in a ethical manner. No >>> one can deny there are bad cops out there & I'm as critical of them as >>> anyone. >> >> An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does >> truth become error because nobody will see it. Just because a jury was >> fooled doesn't mean thier decision was correct. >> >> I wonder if you understand the lack of ethics in the "War on Drugs"? I >> wonder if you understand that a cop accepting free food at Denney's, or >> letting one's cop friends off tickets they deserve is unethical? Most cops >> do these things. Therefore most cops are unethical. >> >>> >>> BTW, stoner, I'm not a cop. >> >> Who gives a fuck. You're a cop apologist. Same delusions. >> >> > I see. It all boils down to the WOD. How telling. You guys started it, and we are a-gonna finish it for ya. Tell us, bad wheels, why are you so wed to the war on drugs? EJ
2003-06-27 08:59:56
On 6/26/03 8:32 PM, in article 3efb3bb5.5594531@news-server.socal.rr.com,
"Bad wheels" > People box all the time without breaking the law. Sporting contests > are not assaults. This would be a grudge match. EJ
2003-06-27 07:58:34
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 08:59:56 +0200, Eric Johnson
wrote: >On 6/26/03 8:32 PM, in article 3efb3bb5.5594531@news-server.socal.rr.com, >"Bad wheels" > >> People box all the time without breaking the law. Sporting contests >> are not assaults. > >This would be a grudge match. > >EJ >
|
|
