Re: US CA: Pot Prosecutions

Thread has been splitted into sub-pages:     1      2      3      4      5      ›      »   



ZZZ 2003-06-26 18:51:38

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:58:43 +0200, Eric Johnson

>On 6/26/03 4:37 PM, in article vfm18sv722ne7@corp.supernews.com, "Just a
>Cyclist" wrote:
>
>>
>> "Eric Johnson" wrote in message
>> news:BB20742B.175E7%erj66@xs4all.nl...
>>> On 6/26/03 12:11 AM, in article vfk7h839skfu67@corp.supernews.com, "Just a
>>> Cyclist" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Again you are wrong. This country was built with the ideas of freedom.
>>>>> Capitalism is limiting freedom of choice to force people to become
>>>>> slaves.
>>>> Not at all......it limits it only when it infringes on the rights of
>>>> others.......much like dopers do!
>>>
>>> All of them, all the time, no matter what the law is where they are?
>>
>> I didn't say that......your in Holland they have different laws......I'm
>> talking about here in the US
>>>
>>> EJ
>>>
>>
>>
>So you agree the that it is the breaking of a law which leads to
>infringement of the rights of others, not the use of any particular
>substance in and of itself?
>


You're going to confuse him Eric.

>EJ




JUST A CYCLIST 2003-06-26 19:28:30


"zzz" wrote in message
news:po8nfvoocqp6g9n3c2235vb9qfsfh13425@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:58:43 +0200, Eric Johnson
>
> >On 6/26/03 4:37 PM, in article vfm18sv722ne7@corp.supernews.com, "Just a
> >Cyclist" wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Eric Johnson" wrote in message
> >> news:BB20742B.175E7%erj66@xs4all.nl...
> >>> On 6/26/03 12:11 AM, in article vfk7h839skfu67@corp.supernews.com,

"Just a
> >>> Cyclist" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Again you are wrong. This country was built with the ideas of

freedom.
> >>>>> Capitalism is limiting freedom of choice to force people to become
> >>>>> slaves.
> >>>> Not at all......it limits it only when it infringes on the rights of
> >>>> others.......much like dopers do!
> >>>
> >>> All of them, all the time, no matter what the law is where they are?
> >>
> >> I didn't say that......your in Holland they have different

laws......I'm
> >> talking about here in the US
> >>>
> >>> EJ
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >So you agree the that it is the breaking of a law which leads to
> >infringement of the rights of others, not the use of any particular
> >substance in and of itself?
> >
>
> You're going to confuse him Eric.

He hasn't confused me.....only lied, backstabbed me that's all........but
like most doper and junkies......so why would I expect anything else?
>
> >EJ
>





JUST A CYCLIST 2003-06-27 07:21:59


"Eric Johnson" wrote in message
news:BB21CD59.17765%erj66@xs4all.nl...
> On 6/27/03 4:28 AM, in article vfnav3f93h6i9b@corp.supernews.com, "Just a
> Cyclist" wrote:
>
> >
> > "zzz" wrote in message
> > news:po8nfvoocqp6g9n3c2235vb9qfsfh13425@4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:58:43 +0200, Eric Johnson
> >>
> >>> On 6/26/03 4:37 PM, in article vfm18sv722ne7@corp.supernews.com, "Just

a
> >>> Cyclist" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "Eric Johnson" wrote in message
> >>>> news:BB20742B.175E7%erj66@xs4all.nl...
> >>>>> On 6/26/03 12:11 AM, in article vfk7h839skfu67@corp.supernews.com,
> > "Just a
> >>>>> Cyclist" wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Again you are wrong. This country was built with the ideas of
> > freedom.
> >>>>>>> Capitalism is limiting freedom of choice to force people to become
> >>>>>>> slaves.
> >>>>>> Not at all......it limits it only when it infringes on the rights

of
> >>>>>> others.......much like dopers do!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All of them, all the time, no matter what the law is where they are?
> >>>>
> >>>> I didn't say that......your in Holland they have different
> > laws......I'm
> >>>> talking about here in the US
> >>>>>
> >>>>> EJ
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> So you agree the that it is the breaking of a law which leads to
> >>> infringement of the rights of others, not the use of any particular
> >>> substance in and of itself?
> >>>
> >>
> >> You're going to confuse him Eric.
> > He hasn't confused me.....only lied, backstabbed me that's

all........but
> > like most doper and junkies......so why would I expect anything else?
>
> One more time, Dale, so you can get it smashed into your brick-head.
>
> 1. Cucyclyn sent me an unsolicited, not requested piece of email with an
> attachment claiming something.


Yet it wasn't unsolicited and then EJ backout of an agreement made by us
two. Yet I was stupid enough to make an agreement with a doper......my
mistake.
He also sent me 5-6 unsolicited e-mails......now how hypocritical is that???
>
> Cucycln is under the impression I forwarded this onto another.

Yes I am...........funny that Mike Hess isn't around anymore
either........could be a coincident?
>
> Further he claims that we had an agreement to keep this communication
> private.

Yes I do.......you broke it and backstab me!
>
> Given that the mail was not asked for, there could be no agreement about
> something I did not know existed until I received it.
>
> Period.
>
> Just a cyclist is trying to perpetrate a fraud on the members of this

group
> whilst attempting to smear my name.

Not smear your name......you done that for yourself........just showing how
much a liar your are.
ie: what about the complaint that you and M. Hess made to the PD......or
lets say the claims that you made.
Care to comment on that Patches.......it never happen even though you
claimed and went on for at least a month.
All were lies......proof......right there that you lie.
>
> It does seem interesting, however, that he is so adamant and systematic
> about his accusation, I wonder if it is all that practice in testilying?

Not all......it's showing others here that you are an unreliable
source.....but your postings have done that.
>
> Cucucycler...Make real accusations, ok? I have said enough bad things

about
> you that likely hurt.

None hurt Patches...... I'm retired, have 90% pension.........plus
investments, summer home in Nova Scotia and love life.
Doing what I want... cycling etc......no complaints at all.......

Complain about that. At least it is real.
See above Patches.........
In fact heading out for a ride now........before it gets too hot......

Have a nice day.......I'm going out side and enjoying the weather and a
healthy life style......
>
>
> EJ
>





ERIC JOHNSON 2003-06-27 19:45:33

On 6/27/03 4:21 PM, in article vfokpbpf5vn9a5@corp.supernews.com, "Just a
Cyclist" wrote:

> 1. Cucyclyn sent me an unsolicited, not requested piece of email with an
>> attachment claiming something.
>
> Yet it wasn't unsolicited and then EJ backout of an agreement made by us
> two. Yet I was stupid enough to make an agreement with a doper......my
> mistake.
> He also sent me 5-6 unsolicited e-mails......now how hypocritical is that???


Objection. Lies.

It was unsolicited. Let him show the evidence that I asked him for anything.

You were stupid to send anything Identifying to anyone you don't know,
especially when then did not ask for it.

I sent him several emails by mistakes, messages which were obviously meant
for the newsgroups.

I had a computer problem at the time, and the replacement computer had a
different configuration of buttons on the program Microsoft Entourage than
the computer I had been working with.

Those who use multiple computers can probably sympathize.

Besides, this last complaint that I am hypocritical rests upon the
assumption that I believe unsolicited mail is bad or bothersome. I do not.

I just maintain that he cannot say that he made a deal with me over an
unsolicited email.


EJ



ERIC JOHNSON 2003-06-27 19:49:45

On 6/27/03 4:21 PM, in article vfokpbpf5vn9a5@corp.supernews.com, "Just a
Cyclist" wrote:

>> Further he claims that we had an agreement to keep this communication
>> private.
> Yes I do.......you broke it and backstab me!


It is broke and back-stabbed, past tense for both. However I did neither
because like steady eddies article, there was no agreement. There cannot be
an agreement about an unsolicited thing.


Why do you insist on making a fool of yourself like this?

This is not an interrogation, Mr. Sipowitz, You cannot "break," me.

EJ



JUST A CYCLIST 2003-06-27 17:38:33


"Eric Johnson" wrote in message
news:BB224F80.177E8%erj66@xs4all.nl...
> On 6/27/03 4:21 PM, in article vfokpbpf5vn9a5@corp.supernews.com, "Just a
> Cyclist" wrote:
>
> >
> >> Cucycln is under the impression I forwarded this onto another.
> > Yes I am...........funny that Mike Hess isn't around anymore
> > either........could be a coincident?
>
> Mike hess is not around for another unrelated reason.

Here again........"unrelated reason" and what is that reason.........no
proof of what it is?
Is he in jail again? or what?
>
> EJ
>





NONSMOKING1@YAHOO.COM (STEADY EDDY) 2003-06-27 19:12:50

Eric Johnson wrote in message news:...
> On 6/27/03 4:21 PM, in article vfokpbpf5vn9a5@corp.supernews.com, "Just a
> Cyclist" wrote:
>
> >
> >> Cucycln is under the impression I forwarded this onto another.
> > Yes I am...........funny that Mike Hess isn't around anymore
> > either........could be a coincident?
>
> Mike hess is not around for another unrelated reason.
>
> EJ


The reason Hess isn't aroud is that he had a sex change operation. His
name is Michelle Hess.




Thread has been splitted into sub-pages:     1      2      3      4      5      ›      »   






Peja Vile Vicious Vision najlepsze projekty domów przewóz osób koparki, www.procreate.pl/pozycjonowanie.html